Top posts

Featured Posts

Showing posts with label Malaysia Agreement 1963. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Malaysia Agreement 1963. Show all posts

It is KL the real culprit why there is SSKM, says veteran activist

PENAMPANG : A veteran political activist in Penampang said actually it was Kuala Lumpur or the Federal power the real culprit responsible for the surging calls for Sabah and Sarawak to exit the Federation.

Fredoline Edwin Lojingki, 74, in a statement issued here today said there would be no such calls and no SSKM (Sabah, Sarawak Keluar Malaysia) had the Federal power cared to listen to Sabah and Sarawak needs and aspiration all these years.

Malaysia has no legitimacy in Sabah, Sarawak?

Comment by Joe Fernandez
Former Petagas Assemblyman James Ligunjang  -- defeated in 1994, according to him, by illegal voters on the electoral rolls -- is misleading everybody with his Hormati Perjanjian Malaysia 63 Campaign.

He does not touch on the following:

Hormati Perjanjian Malaysia 1963 is like flogging a dead horse. It's too little, too late.

There is no Malaysia in Borneo, says veteran writer Fernandez

By Joe Fernandez
If you are free to enter a partnership, you are also free to leave it. If you are not free to leave a partnership, then it's not a partnership. It's occupation and re-colonization.

The issue is that Malaysia has no legitimacy in Borneo. If someone steals your land, you have to get it back. Not live as a slave on your own land with the thief.

Malaysia juga boleh hilang seperti MH370

Pada tenghahari Khamis tanggal 27 Februari lalu, saya berpeluang sembang-sembang politik dengan ADUN Bingkor, Datuk Dr Jeffrey Kitingan di pejabatnya di Damai, Kota Kinabalu. Saya pernah sekali dua berbual-bual dengannya yang juga Presiden UBF tapi pertemuan kali ini  lebih rasmi dan penuh dengan kemesraan.

Tepat jam 12 tengah hari, Tony Minggir yang mengatur pertemuan itu memberi isyarat Dr Jeffrey sudah sedia menunggu di pejabatnya. Tony Minggir adalah seorang aktivis UBF yang aktif.

Mengah juga memanjat tangga di tingkat empat. Namun rasa penat seketika hilang sebaik Dr Jeffrey dengan wajah yang ceria buka pintu, menghulur tangan bersalam dan mempersilakan kami duduk.

“Di sini tidak boleh merokok,” kata Tony secara bergurau. Saya ketawa. Di kedai Mamak tadi, saya dan Tony tak putus-putus merokok sambil berbincang soal depan negeri Sabah.

Banyak ilmu yang saya perolehi dari Tony Minggir yang banyak membuat penyelidikan tentang Malaysia Agreement 1963. Dr Jeffrey tersenyum dengan gurauan Tony.

Dalam raut wajah yang tenang telah mula kelihatan garis-garis usia. Dr Jeffrey sudah menjangkaui usia 60an. Tapi semangatnya bercakap soal hak Sabah tidak pernah luntur.

Hati saya berbisik, selepas Jeffrey, siapa lagi pemimpin Sabah yang berani bercakap soal hak Sabah dan sanggup dipenjarakan? Barangkali ramai anak-anak muda di luar sana, menggunakan laman sosial dan mempunyai semangat jati diri yang tinggi tapi berapa ramaikah yang mempunyai pengetahuan, fakta, keberanian dan kecekalan seperti Dr J?.

Dr J tenang sentiasa tenang menjawab persoalan saya. Ada kalanya soalan saya bersifat provokasi. Namun jawapannya tidak sedikitpun disaluti emosi benci atau marah kepada Kerajaan Pusat.

Beliau berhujah berasaskan fakta dan kerap merujuk kepada persetujuan yang telah dicapai dalam Perjanjian Malaysia 1963.

“Bagi pandangan saya idea Malaysia hanya satu transisi untuk mencapai kemerdekaan. Gagasan Malaysia ini saya anggap bukan sesuatu projek yang akan berkekalan tapi satu transisi untuk memberi bimbingan atau guidance kepada Sabah dan Sarawak menjadi dewasa dalam politik  untuk bertanggungjawab dan memerintah sendiri,” Jeffrey memulakan hujah.

Adakah beliau optimis ia boleh dicapai?

” Saya optimis matlamat itu boleh dicapai. Singapura boleh memerintah sendiri. Sebenarnya projek Malaysia juga untuk mencari penyelesaian Singapura. Terpulang kepada kita untuk mencari jalan yang terbaik.,” katanya.

Beliau memberi contoh, masalah PTI (pendatang tanpa izin) bukan masalah yang tidak boleh selesai. Mereka ini adalah orang kita juga. Masalahnya kita tidak ada kuasa menyelesaikannya.

“Cuba Kerajaan Pusat beri kita kuasa. Masalah mereka sama seperti kita. Menuntut hak kebebasan. Kita mempunyai cukup sumber untuk menyelesaikan apa juga masalah di negeri Sabah. Kita boleh berunding dengan mereka secara baik. Jika ini dapat ditangani tidak akan timbul insiden seperti di Lahad Datu,”ujarnya lagi.

Apakah perlu sebuah pembangkang kuat seperti Pakatan Rakyat untuk dapat mencapai matlamat tersebut. Maksud saya untuk mendapatkan “new deal” untuk Sabah?.

“Saya bersetuju sebuah parti pembangkang yang kuat boleh melakukan check and balance seperti kewujudan Pakatan Rakyat sekarang. Itu di peringkat Pusat, tetapi d iperingkat negeri, kita tidak boleh diwakili sebuah parti nasional yang set up sama seperti Umno dan BN. PKR juga tidak menghormati hak otonomi negeri Sabah. Sama seperti Umno, Pengerusi Perhubungan dilantik Kuala Lumpur bukan rakyat Sabah yang pilih.

Dr Jeffrey berpendapat iika PR memerintah tentu  caranya sama seperti Umno dan BN, kita juga akan terperangkap dalam permainan politik mereka, jika PKR berkuasa diperingkat Pusat.

“Cuba lihat kedudukan Sabah dan Sarawak sebagai perbandingan. Negeri Sarawak terbukti masih mampu mempertahankan hak-hak negeri kerana negeri itu diwakili parti tempatan,” dakwanya.

Beliau menambah manakala di Sabah, walaupun pemimpin-pemimpin tempatan berkuasa tetapi mereka harus menjaga ‘elit politik’ di Kuala Lumpur.

“Di Sarawak, Ketua Menteri negeri itu hanya menjaga Sarawak, sedangkan Ketua Menteri Sabah perlu menjaga kepentingan Umno dan kedudukannya,” jelasnya.

Fulfill Malaysia Agreement or Go Separate Ways - Dr. Jeffrey

Kota Kinabalu: “Now that the installation of Pehin Sri Taib as the 7th Governor of Sarawak has taken place, the leaders of Sabah and Sarawak need to focus and speak with one voice that the Malaysia Agreement needs to be implemented and fulfilled” said Datuk Dr. Jeffrey Kitingan, STAR Sabah Chief, commenting on Malaysia’s top judge, Chief Justice Tun Arifin Zakaria that Sabah and Sarawak formed Malaysia and that they are key partners in the Federation of Malaysia.

Breaking the Mind Control in Malaysia, Sarawak Style

Jurucakap GANASThe government especially the BN/UMNO government has been involved in mind control experiments since Malaysia is formed.  Their forays into this activities can be seen from their attempt to distort history, which some are directly imposed upon the ignorant population through the education history curriculum especially in schools.  There are also other ways less obvious that they are doing through “subliminal stimuli” – using any sensory stimuli below individual threshold for conscious perception.  These have been scientifically proven and the techniques used extensively after the First World War especially in the United States and Europe.  For more detail review of these ideas please read Gustav La Bon, Edward Barney and Walter Lippmann.
As the result, these techniques become a tool that the authority in Malaysia has adopted to indoctrinate the population to conform to a certain ideas.  A very good example of this is in the use of subliminal stimuli on the general population to accept that Malaysia was established since 1957.

LIMITATIONS TO SUPREMACY OF MALAYSIA CONSTITUTION

zainal4Who cares when you or me shouted defiance at UMNO, but when a Chief Minister of a State whisper defiance the whole world take notice.  Defiance in the face of nature or such things is just a mere shouting match.  But defiance against the most powerful and long lasting political party such as UMNO in Malaysia now that is for the history books.  Pehin Sri Abdul Taib Mahmud rejection over UMNO and its brand of politics in Sarawak is something not to be trifle with.  To strengthen his defiance he had thrown the Malaysia Agreement 1963 to legitimize his claim.  Taib tough stand exposes Sabah government weaknesses and pathetic effort in defending Sabah “independent” rights as well.  Effectively Taib has drawn a clear dividing line between Sarawak and UMNO in Malaya, but what about UMNO in Sabah? Is Taib leaving his rear wide open?

Parliamentary Seats are Constitutional Safeguards for Sabah Sarawak – Dr. Jeffrey

Kota Kinabalu:    “Allocation of parliamentary seats for Sabah and Sarawak should not be based solely on population and as though Sabah and Sarawak are equal in status to the States in the Peninsula” said Datuk Dr. Jeffrey Kitingan, STAR Sabah Chief, commenting on the view that extra seats will not help Sabah and Sarawak or that Sabah and Sarawak are not entitled to extra seats in the new re-delineation exercise due to its lower population.

Implement Malaysia Agreement Not Just Review - Jeffrey

Kota Kinabalu:    “The call for a review of the safeguards for Sabah and Sarawak and their status as equal partners to Malaya by Tengku Razaleigh or more affectionally known as Ku Li needs to be brought up in Parliament and must be fully supported by all the MPs from Sabah and Sarawak, if it is to succeed ” said Datuk Dr. Jeffrey Kitingan, STAR Sabah Chief in commenting on Ku Li’s call to review the status of Sabah and Sarawak in Malaysia.


Review, Implement MA63 Not Just Development - Jeffrey

Kota Kinabalu:  “The election is over and the Prime Minister should just cut the crap and stop the rhetorics.  What is needed for Sabah and Sarawak is not just promises of not neglecting in development but a review, perhaps overhaul, and a sincere implementation of the Malaysia Agreement 1963” said DatukDr. Jeffrey Kitingan, STAR Sabah Chief in reply to PM Najib’s Malaysia Day message that Sabah and Sarawak will not be left behind in development.

To Sabahans and the founding fathers of Sabah, the Malaysia is a nightmare of broken promises and shattered dreams as can be evaluated from the four distinguished “Tan Sri” speakers at the forum “The Formation of Malaysia – The Untold Story” organized recently by the Sabah Society.

In whose hands lies Sabah’s destiny?

It is time to end decades of grinding uncertainty
which has harmed the economic growth of Sabah.
For more than three and a half decades, the people of Sabah have always been aware of the huge number of foreigners arriving here and given fast-track citizenships to become voters.
We now hear directly from the horses’ mouth in the Royal Commission of Inquiry, confirming the clandestine modus operandi employed by Umno and carried out by the Election Commission and National Registration Department in rigging every Sabah election to sabotage the Sabahans’ choice of governments.
Unless the Barisan Nasional federal government now swiftly abolish the death penalty like it did the Internal Security Act, all the conspirators from both sides of the political divide might be sent to the gallows for high treason when their immunity from prosecution is revoked and removed once a change of government takes place.

Sabah’s oil curse strikes again

Poverty-riddled Sabah is the sixth biggest contributor to
the national economy, contributing more than a quarter of
the total oil and gas produced in the country.
KOTA KINABALU: Sabah lost control of its oil wealth more than 30 years ago but the fallout of the widely acknowledged cock-eyed contract is continuing to roil business dealings in the state.
The state Barisan Nasional government is now facing more questions over how it is managing the Petronas-sponsored Sabah Oil and Gas Terminal (SOGT) project that began more than a year ago.
The Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP) has accused Chief Minister Musa Aman’s Umno-led BN government of failing to safeguard the interest of the local companies in the ongoing multi-billion-ringgit project.
Melanie Chia, the party’s outspoken women’s wing chief, said there appeared to be no attempt by the state government to ensure locals get a bigger share of the spin-offs from the SOGT project.

September 16th is Historic But a Black Day for Sabah/Sarawak: STAR

“September 16th could have been more than a historic day for Malaysia had the Malaysia Agreement, 1963, the promises, assurances and undertakings by the senior partner to the Federation had been fulfilled but, alas, this was not the case, thus making September 16th as a Black Day for Sabah and Sarawak” said Datuk Dr. Jeffrey Kitingan, Chairman of STAR Sabah in response to the various comments on Malaysia Day.

Sabah’s founding fathers of Malaysia had great hopes of and expectations for Malaysia.  They were even prepared to sacrifice Sabah’s new found independence in favour of a new federation in the hope that this partnership would bring far more (than) benefits, in terms of security, economic prosperity and development without compromising too much of their rights as a sovereign nation.

Pemuda Umno Keningau Guna Sentimen 20 Perkara Raih Simpati Pengundi, Star

Oleh: Mail Mathew
TENOM: Ketua Pergerakan Pemuda Parti Star Sabah Hasmin Azroy Abdullah (gambar), menyifatkan tindakan Ketua Pergerakan Pemuda Umno Keningau Azman Haji Ruslan baru baru ini yang membangkitkan semula isu 20 Perkara sekadar meraih perhatian pucuk pimpinan Umno agar beliau dicalunkan pada pilihanraya umum kali ke-13 (PRU-13) akan datang ini.

Beliau berkata, tidak mungkin Azman tidak memahaminya sedangkan ramai pemimpin utama Barisan Nasional (BN) sudah menyatakan bahawa 20 Perkara mempunyai justifikasinya namun beliau sengaja membangkitkannya lagi dalam usahanya menjadi “hero” untuk melawan arus.

S'wak can’t step outside bounds on ties with Putrajaya


By Joe Fernandez

Malaysia Agreement or no Malaysia Agreement, Sarawak or Sabah/Labuan for that matter, cannot step outside the bounds with the Federal Government. Putrajaya belongs as much to the two Malaysian states in Borneo as to Peninsular Malaysia.

At a lower level, the Federal Government presides over the individual sultanates, states and territories in Peninsular Malaysia.

Five on-going issues, some simmering for long, have pitted the Sarawak state government in a head-long clash against the Federal Government. It’s anybody's guess how Putrajaya will bring the recalcitrant Taib Mahmud regime to heel. Surely, the Joseph Pairin Kitingan administration (1985 - 1994) in Sabah is the mother of all precedents!

Prime Minister's post a bridge to cross at the right time!

By Joe Fernandez
Pas President Hadi Awang should not have said that only a "Malay" Muslim -- probably "determined" by a DNA test a la Pas -- will be Prime Minister if and when Pakatan Rakyat (PR) seizes the reins of power in Putrajaya and initiates, forms and leads the Federal Government.

Is he implying that a "Malay" Muslim is not the Prime Minister now and that "Malay" Muslims have never held the post?

What he said is not unlawful in a Court of Law.


Sabah BN leaders clash over 20-point pact


By Raymond Tombung
KOTA KINABALU: Sabah Legislative Assembly Speaker Salleh Said Keruak is in hot water for claiming that the 20-point Malaysia Agreement “doesn’t exist anymore”.
In what many see as an amusing development, two Barisan Nasional leaders are now fighting over the issue of 20-point Malaysia Agreement.
Last Sunday, Salleh had reportedly dismissed the 20-point Malaysia Agreement, saying it was no longer valid.
He stirred an old hornets’ nest over Sabah’s rights, sparking reactions from both BN leaders as well as Sabah STAR (State Reform Party).
Salleh had said that the 20-point agreement was no longer valid because it is already part of the Malaysian Constitution.

STAR Sabah kesal pembentukan Malaysia dilakukan tergesa gesa oleh pemimpin terdahulu

Oleh: KULI KULI AK
Datuk Dr Jeffrey berucap ketika melancarkan Parti
Star di DUN Kemabong.
KEMABONG: Pemimpin terdahulu telah membuat keputusan tergesa-gesa dalam persetujuan pembentukan Malaysia melalui penyatuan Tanah Melayu, Sabah, Sarawak dan Singapura. Ini adalah antara punca utama hak asasi rakyat Sabah sepertimana yang terkandung dalam 20 Perkara mudah dimanipulasikan oleh pihak persekutuan.

Negara Brunei dan Singapura yang kini jauh lebih maju dan pesat membangun malah memiliki ekonomi yang jauh lebih baik berbanding Sabah selepas mereka tidak meneruskan untuk bersama dalam pembentukkan Malaysia pada ketika itu (Singapura keluar dari Malaysia tahun 1965).

S’pore’s exit nullified Malaysia Agreement

The Malaysia Agreement, signed in 1963, has lost its legitimacy among its entities.

By Joseph Wilfred Lakai

The Malaysia Agreement 1963 is a binding treaty that was signed by several representatives from the five parties, namely United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the Federation of Malaya, North Borneo (Sabah), Sarawak and Singapore.

The main objective of this agreement relates to the formation of Malaysia.


Search This Blog