Top posts

Featured Posts

‘Whose money is Musa holding?’

Sabah Chief Minister Musa has claimed that a large part of his multi-million fortune held in foreign accounts is not privately owned by him.
KUALA LUMPUR: PKR wants Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak to clarify “leaked” investigation papers that a Swiss bank account linked to Sabah Chief Minister Musa Aman contains US$100 million belonging to Umno.
Musa allegedly told Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) officers that the money in question traced to a bank in Zurich, Switzerland and under investigation by banking and criminal investigation agencies overseas was not his but Umno’s, said a senior PKR official.
PKR vice president Tian Chua who is also MP for Batu, said Najib must explain Musa’s alleged statement linking Umno and therefore the government to the hitherto secret party slush fund.
The money is part of a large sum being traced by international investigative reporters including of online media, Sarawak Report, who published details of transactions connecting Musa, Sabah businessman Michael Chia as well as many in Malaysian and Swiss banking in questionable financial deals crisscrossing several countries.
When Chia was caught with S$16 million cash in Hong Kong few years ago, he reportedly told the Hong Kong Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) that the money belonged to Musa.
Musa however immediately denied knowing Chia and by inference anything about the money.
However pictures of them together and details of transactions including payments to Musa’s two sons in Australia were then exposed by the online media raising further questions about the matter.
This prompted more information being exposed by authorities in Zurich, Hong Kong and Kuala Lumpur.
According to Tian Chua, on June 15, PKR deputy secretary general Darell Leiking, parliamentarian Sivarasa Rasiah and he held a press conference in the Parliament House questioning the government’s inaction despite detailed information becoming public of a money laundering operation that has implicated Musa.
“On June 21, I received a reply from the prime minister on the status of the investigation of corruption allegations against Musa following the arrest of Michael Chia in Hong Kong.
“The answer from PM stated that MACC had provided full cooperation with Hong Kong ICAC and had completed the investigation. Presently the file is on the table of Attorney-General but so far no action has been taken,” he said.
Funds ‘held in trust’
Tian Chua said the case received new attention when NGO activist Prof Monika Roth filed a suit against Swiss UBS Bank linking the bank with the money laundering operations in Sabah.
However, once again, there was total silence from the Malaysian government, he said.
“A few days ago, I received a mysterious phone call from an unknown person who claimed that he was a staff member of MACC.
“He revealed that the MACC had initiated a new investigation on Musa where he was interviewed by several MACC officers on a date not told to me.
“Musa defended his actions and told the MACC officers to “check their facts with the prime minister.”
“Musa claimed that a large part of his multi-million fortune held in foreign currency accounts overseas was not privately owned by him.
“Instead it was held in trust on behalf of Umno. Now the public is eager to know whether this is true, and if the PM is aware of this.
“As the phone call was confidential and I had no means to verify the information, I hereby call upon the PM to step forward to clarify whether the MACC had initiated a new investigation on Musa.
“I also call on (Attorney-General) Abdul Gani Patail to step aside vis-a-vis the investigation related to Musa as it is clear that the AG is unable to convince the public of his impartiality,” said Tian Chua.

165 comments:

  1. percaya atau tidak, terpulang kepada rakyat untuk menilainya.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If we continuously putting ourselves into the scandal, I don't think it is a smart thing to do.

      Delete
    2. There are no proof as yet to show that these allegations are true. All these information are gotten by Sarawak Report from a 'Trusted' source, but no one can be sure that the trusted source can really be trusted or not?

      Delete
    3. Internet has lots of lies.

      Delete
    4. Masih tiada bukti mengesahkannya, harus tunggu perkembangan selanjutnya.

      Delete
    5. Each and everyone has his/her own opinion regarding this matter. We couldn't control what they want to think. Just wait and see the final result.

      Delete
    6. Tiada bukti yang kukuh untuk menuatkan dakwaan ini.

      Delete
  2. Tak hairanlah mereka buat begitu sebab semua bos BN begitu.. sayang duit rakyat..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The oppositions are trying to convey different messages so yeah, they succeeded .

      Delete
    2. Jadi bos2 pembangkang macam mana pula? Adakah mereka menjimatkan duit rakyat?

      Delete
    3. why is musa not suing these people if he is clean???? think

      Delete
    4. Musa is not like Harris. Sue here, sue there. Musa has many responsibilities that he needs to focus on more rather than entertaining such rumors.

      Delete
  3. The RM400 million belong to Musa and Najib lah. no other persons involved.. That is why Najib keeps Musa as Sabah CM and that is why is not worried lah kawan.. Faham sudahkah....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tunggulah penjelasan daripada Datuk Najib Razak mengenai dakwaan bahawa RM400 juta ini kepunyaan parti.

      Delete
    2. RM400m? I bet this is only a so called hear and say.

      Delete
    3. Kalau taktau hal sebenar tu jangan sembarang cakap.

      Delete
    4. Do you really see the exchange between Najib and Musa? Do you really witness that? I bet you don't. Never.

      Delete
    5. Ini lah sifat manusia yang hanya menjatuhkan orang lain. Jika tiada bukti yang menunjukkan bahawa beliau terlibat maka itu hanya imaginasi anda saja.

      Delete
    6. Wah Makccik, do you have the proof? Don't just say it because you don't like Musa and Najib. Every allegation needs proof, otherwise it just an allegation.

      Delete
    7. Pandai saja menuduh, ada buktikh yang mengatakan RM400m tu milik MUsa dan Najib, jangan menuduh sebarangan.

      Delete
  4. kadang-kadang isu tertentu sengaja dipanaskan oleh pihak tertentu walau pun isu tersebut tidak diketahui kesahihannya.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Isu ini keluar bila PRU makin dekat.Biasa lah tujuan dia hanya untuk menajtuhkan BN.

      Delete
    2. Jadi no wonder jugalah, makin dekat PRU makin lah pula banyak isu yang timbul.

      Delete
    3. Kalau isu itu tidak dipanaskan, mana ada orang mau baca, kan?

      Delete
    4. Memang macam tu la lumrah manusia, taktahu nak menghargai.

      Delete
    5. This is so called " fanning " to ask for publicity.

      Delete
    6. Indeed,they love to make headlines out of it.

      Delete
    7. Harapkan tiada pihak manipulasikan isu ini.

      Delete
    8. This thing is cliche. Common to happen whenever election is around the corner.

      Delete
  5. tunggu dan lihat sajalah. selagi tiada bukti tidak boleh tuduh2 jg kan.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Itulah yang sebaiknya dilakukan. Kalau tidak, tersangatlah tidak adil kita menuduh Musa sedangkan bukti pun tidak ada yang boleh dipercayai.

      Delete
    2. Tunggulah sehingga pihak MACC untuk mendapatkan bukti yang mencukupi, kalau tidak cukup bukti, tiada apapa boleh buat terhadap beliau.

      Delete
    3. ya. .baik tunggu hasil siasatan, dari bising pada benda belum pasti.

      Delete
    4. Fitnah memang macam tu maka tidak hairan lah kalau ada mereka yang suka timbulkan isu2 panas untuk itu.

      Delete
    5. Tiada bukti kukuh, jadi tiada kes la..

      Delete
    6. The people should be careful in making assumptions.

      Delete
    7. Who are we to judge? This case needs formal judiciary, not informal judiciary like coffee shop talk or blog talk.

      Delete
  6. Isu ini bukan boleh di percayai.Tiada bukti kukuh.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jadi duit yg di tangkap sama sama Michael Chia dan katanya milik Musa tu apa? Bukan bukti?

      Wang ratusan juta dalam akaun di Switxerland t duit siapa? Laporan Sarawak Report wang keluar - masuk akaun hia, Richard Barnes , syarikat2 proxy dan dua anak Musa di Austrralian tu bukan bukti kah..

      Kau tahukah apa keterangan dorang sama SPRM?? Bukti kunun..cit tarak bac punya orang..

      Delete
    2. Then do you have proofs?

      Delete
    3. That's what we called slandered news.

      Delete
    4. Najib pernah cakap yang laporan siasatan sudah siap cuma menunggu AG untuk putuskannya.

      Delete
    5. Laporan sarawak report itu lagilah tidak boleh di percayai, Semua ini hanya mainan pembangkang sahaja, dan MIchael Chia tiada kaitan dengan Datuk Musa.

      Delete
  7. Bukti belum cukup kukuh, macam mana nak tuduh Musa pula.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I heard these kinds of accusations numerous times and I get sick of it. Why you guys acting so immature? Come on, we are not in the warzone countries. We should be thankful for what we have instead of kept harping on old issues, added salt and pepper to it.

      Delete
    2. Tuduhan tanpa bukti seakan fitnah.

      Delete
    3. Ini saja modal yang pembangkang ada. Itulah isu ini dimanipulasi dan diulang-ulang saja. Pembangkang saja mahu alihkan perhatian rakyat untuk mengelak kes rasuah di dalam parti pembangkang.

      Delete
  8. Isu ni seringkali muncul di laman web. Tapi satu pun siasatan takda juga kena buat. Apa cerita???

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Diorang ni memang tak boleh nak duduk diam. Pantang lihat orang mati menggeletar.

      Delete
    2. Kan tengah tunggu AG buat keputusan. Siasatan ada dibuat tapi itu bukan beerti Musa bersalah. Lagipun beliau sudi beri kerjasama.

      Delete
    3. Datuk Musa sudi untuk bekerjasama, jadi itu sudah menunjukkan yang beliau memang tidak bersalah.

      Delete
  9. Musa adalah pemimpin yang berwibawa dan sukar untuk ditandingi... sebab itulah banyak isu -ve dilemparkan terhadapnya semata-mata untuk memburukkan nama beliau.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, and I think this is one of the bad habits amongst us. We are more interested in having a bad snap instead of a positive one.

      Delete
    2. Kalau Musa bukan pemimpin yang bagus, takkan ada pelaburan RM10 billion dapat dibuat di Sabah. Musa merupakan seorang KM yang telah membawa banyak kemajuan di Sabah.

      Delete
  10. It is up to the people say whatever they want to say.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But we couldn't hold our hands tight. We have to stand for the truth too.

      Delete
    2. Whatever it is, we only can wait for the final result.

      Delete
  11. I suggest there investigate this matter properly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Investigation will get worse if the oppositions are putting their dirty hands on.

      Delete
    2. Pihak SPRm harus membuat siasatan yang sepatutnya.

      Delete
    3. Terlalu banyak fitnah dan khabar angin hanya akan mengelirukan dan mengganggu proses siasatan.

      Delete
    4. Harap Musa akan terus menjalankan tugas beliau sebagai KM, jangan peduli dengan cakap2 kosong semua ini.

      Delete
  12. Musa will have to prove he is innocent after all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Musa is innocent until proven guilty.

      Delete
  13. I don’t care what they say about Musa, he is still the best so far.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. setuju, beliau antara yang terbaik buat masa ini.

      Delete
    2. lihat pada isu negatif saja.. cuba lihat pada sumbangan dia pada rakyat.. byk dia sumbangkan pada pembangunan Sabah. kita harus hargainya.

      Delete
    3. Biasa pembangkang, hanya mau lihat dari sudut negatif sahaja.

      Delete
    4. Nobody is perfect. Whoever becomes the CM will face many criticisms. Therefore, a CM must be wise in dealing such situations.

      Delete
  14. Issues like this will always come up as it remains political issues.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed it is. One must know how to judge this matter rationally.

      Delete
  15. This is all because the election is around the corner.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Macam2 isu dikeluarkan oleh pembangkang mau dekat2 pru ini. Namun ini semua pasti dapat di tepis oleh CM kita.

      Delete
    2. isu2 sengaja dimainkan untuk jatuhkan Musa, tapi ia masih belum lagi dpt jatuhkan Musa.

      Delete
    3. Semua ini permainan politik untuk menjatuhkan pihak lawan.

      Delete
  16. Let the oppositions provide concrete evidences.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oppositions like to recycle stories only.

      Delete
  17. Please discuss something better, since there is no solid ground for proof.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They talked so much about Musa. Meaning to say Musa is doing excellence jobs since he got lots of attention compare to other CMs in M'sia.

      Delete
  18. Musa would have to come up for some explanations.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Musa sudah jelaskan banyak kali yang beliau tidak bersalah dan bersedia untuk beri kerjasama dalam siasatan. Terpulang kepada pihak lain untuk menerimanya ataupun terus menyebarkan fitnah.

      Delete
  19. How can we be convinced?

    ReplyDelete
  20. He would have to show his innocence and impartiality.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Musa for Sabah and remains the same.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Regardless of what they have said, let’s appreciate what he has done for Sabah.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed. Don't be too busy condemning him until forgot the good things he has done to Sabah.

      Delete
  23. I can’t want to see what he has to say.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Let he come to the public about his facts.

    ReplyDelete
  25. If at all is true…the whole money spent are gone already lahhhhh

    ReplyDelete
  26. Alleged irregularities in two forms, namely involving the purchase of 'curious' on Talam assets amounted to RM676 million and the 'mystery' to any provision of RM392 million approved in 2009 to settle the debt the company incurred. It is clear that this PKR Party is a party that was corrupt. The longer they ruled in the state this, it is possible the state will 'bankrupt'.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. PKR's own folly in Selangor is no excuse to let Musa rip off Sabahans !

      Delete
    2. Azmin Ali was said to receive payment from Vincent Tan amounting to RM15,000 per month. This allegation is made by Raja Petra Kamaruddin. Why no investigation on this case? Is it because Azmin is a Pakatan member therefore he is safe from corruption claims?

      Delete
    3. No one will ever investigate the PKR people because they refuse to believe that the opposition are capable of corruption.

      Delete
    4. Biasa lah, jika pembangkang buat salah, mereka akan tutup sebaik mungkin.

      Delete
    5. Azmin harus di siasat juga.

      Delete
  27. What is evident is that the Chief Minister Datuk Musa Aman, who was well experienced in the corporate world before he entered politics, has been able to take Sabah's financial status to greater heights and bring rapid development to the State. He presented a State budget of RM4.048 billion for 2012, making it the biggest budget ever proposed in the history of Sabah

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That only means government can now collect ,more income from the people and the corporate lah, that is why the RM4 billion budget, but it ws still a deficit budget because BN wanted to spend more than what they can collect that is only slightly more than RM3 billion his year... In 10 years from now, naturally Sabah budget culd be well into RM8 billion per year but that is because w can collect more than RM7 billion in 10 years.. What i the fuse? But mind you Sabah' annual wealth is well beyong RM40 billion, big chunk of it goes to the 11-state lazy Malaya.. Go learn my friend and defend Sabahans not the Umno rippers

      Delete
    2. The RM4.08 billion state budget from the Prime Minister will bring many more developments for Sabah this year. No other CM has ever obtain this much budget for the state.

      Delete
    3. Datuk Musa Aman was able to increase the state reserves to RM3 billion which has gotten the praises from the auditor general himself. Other CM's only know how to such the state reserves dry.

      Delete
    4. Kita harus berterima kasih kepada Datuk Musa yang banyak memberi pembangunan kepada Sabah.

      Delete
    5. Kerana Datuk Musa, Sabah semakin maju.

      Delete
  28. asyik2 isu Musa.. isu2 melibatkan pemimpin2 lain kenapa tidak diberi perhatian, seperti Skandal shafie yag melibatkan projek bekalan air di luar bandar yang terbengkalai.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bukan saja itu skandal berkaitan dengan Shafie, bagaimana dengan skandal bahawa Shafie membayar duit berjuta-juta kepada wanita simpanannya yang didedahkan oleh Zuraida dari PKR?

      Delete
    2. Sekarang ini, Datuk Musa yang akan jadi perhatian, sebab semua ketua pemimpin pembangkang di sabah bercita2 besar mau jadi Km Sabah.

      Delete
  29. Musa adalah pemimpin yang terbaik buat masa ini.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Only Musa can provide the answer to that question.

    ReplyDelete
  31. DO not blame anyone who might be innocent.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Shouldn't we discuss other matters that are relevant?

    ReplyDelete
  33. I suppose they are aware of what is going on...why ask the public?

    ReplyDelete
  34. I suggest we wait for further investigation on this matter.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It would help explaining yet uncovered mysteries.

      Delete
  35. I suppose the authorities might have to respond to this.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Trust has a way of revealing itself....we will find out.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Something might not seem right after all...investigate properly!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. proper investigation is a must in order to ensure that no one is being simply accused here.

      Delete
  38. Are there other ideas waiting to be risen by the other oppositions?

    ReplyDelete
  39. We shouldn’t make false accusations on anyone just yet.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Let’s allow justice to prevail and see what happens afterwards.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes until it is proven otherwise.

      Delete
  41. What does UMNO have to say about this?

    ReplyDelete
  42. Can anyone confirm whether the reports are authentic or not?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sarawak Report said they gotten the information from trustworthy source, but only they know who the trustworthy source is.

      Delete
  43. why can't we wait for clarification from the PM ? Do not judge anyone until it is proven guilty

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. PM will need to provide some clarification whether it is true that the money belongs to UMNO.

      Delete
    2. I doubt UMNO will waste time clarifying this sort of rumors, Datuk Musa Aman also said he will not waste his time on this sort of speculations.

      Delete
  44. Only him can answer the question, perhaps others with him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Only him and GOd knows the real truth.

      Delete
    2. Let GOD be the judge when the time comes.

      Delete
  45. DO we really need to stress this matter any further?

    ReplyDelete
  46. with all these accusations against him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. accusation like this only happen when election is just around the corner.

      Delete
    2. Accusations without proof couldn't bring Datuk Musa down.

      Delete
  47. Do they really think hey can defect him?

    ReplyDelete
  48. I feel there is something wrong some where.

    ReplyDelete
  49. well it does make sense if the money belongs to UMNO.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The money could possible belong to Michael Chia.

      Delete
  50. Cukup menjijikkan apabila ketua menteri cuba merasuah Tunku Aziz dengan kedudukan sebagai felo kanan di Penang Institute.

    Tan Tee Beng berkata ia adalah rasuah dan penyalahgunaan kuasa jika Lim telah merancang untuk menggunakan wang kerajaan bagi menyelamatkan imej DAP. Tunku Aziz juga mendakwa pada hari Isnin bahawa setiausaha politik Lim, Zairil Khir Johari, telah menelefon dan mengulangi tawaran itu, beserta dengan wangtunai sebanyak RM50, 000.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pihak Pakatan Rakyat kata memperjuangkan hak bersuara, tapi jelas DAP tidak suka bila Tunku Aziz mengeluarkan pendapat beliau mengenai isu perhimpunan Bersih. Sehingga Tunku Aziz terpaksa meletak jawatan.

      Delete
    2. Lepas Tunku Aziz keluar parti, DAP cuba nak merasuah beliau supaya kembali ke parti DAP. Sudah terlambat, bukan semua orang boleh dibeli dengan duit.

      Delete
  51. Tunku Aziz Tunku Ibrahim has openly attacked Lim Guan Eng, saying he does not trust the DAP secretary-general and ending any hopes of bringing the former party vice-chairman back into the fold after his resignation on Monday. HOT ISSUES IN PULAU PINANG..
    hehe :) Tunku Aziz, who was the party’s most senior Malay leader, said Guan Eng “had no sense of decency and was biadap (uncouth).” “Kit Siang and I are old friends. I trust him but his son (Guan Eng) is a different kettle of fish,” he told The Star in an interview published today, referring to DAP parliamentary leader Lim Kit Siang.

    Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng, violate the principles of CAT (efficiency, accountability and transparency) invention by providing a feed of RM50, 000 and his fellow right-kepadaTunku Abdul Aziz Tunku Ibrahim to remain in the party...

    ReplyDelete
  52. Wanita yang licin mukanya kerana berminyak, licin jugalah lidahnya memberikan alasan sekalipun alasan itu hanya mendedahkan lagi tembelang busuknya selama menjadi SETPOL Khalid Ibrahim siapa tidak kenal dengan Faekah Husin. Pendedahan yang dibuat berhubung dua pucuk surat yang mengandungi tandatangan Faekah Husin sekaligus menunjukkan amalan kronisme melampau dalam Pejabat Menteri Besar Selangor, ternyata membuatkan SETPOL Khalid Ibrahim itu tidak senang duduk. Apa sudah jadi dengan kerajaan yang kununnya satu kerajaan yang benar dan jujur dalam pengurusan untuk rakyat ini. Inikah yang dikatakan sebelum ini?

    ReplyDelete
  53. Info bukan dari luar juga yang memberikan tapi Gerakan dari dalam PKR Selangor sendiri telah membuat desakkan agar Faekah Husin dipecat dari jawatannya dan dihalau keluar dari Pejabat Menteri Besar Selangor berhubung penyalahgunaan kuasa yang sangat besar, selain sikap memandai-mandai dan lepas mulutnya, kini orang yang gemar mencari salah silap Khir Toyo itu berhadapan pula dengan sesuatu yang lebih besar.

    Nampaknya semakin gelaplah masa hadapan Faekah Husin ini, dulu bukan main mahu menyalahkan orang lain, jaga tepi kain orang lain. Tapi sekarang nampak sudah diri sendiri lebih teruk dari apa yang disangka.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Mengenai isu pasir pula di Selangor. Apa sudah jadi ini kerajaan PR. Cakap tidak akan melakukan rasuah dan membenterasnya tapi macam itu cakap-cakap politik saja. Pasir dicuri ditubuh pula kerajaan Pusat yang melakukannya. Sedangkan yang kita tahu Kerajaan Negeri yang menguruskan semua ini. Apa yang berlaku ini jawapannya..

    Tindakan Dr. Lo’Lo’ Mohamad Ghazali, Pas – Titiwangsa yang cuba menyalahkan kerajaan Pusat dalam isu curi pasir di Selangor akhirnya memakan diri apabila tuduhannya itu dipatahkan oleh Menteri Sumber Asli dan Alam Sekitar, Datuk Seri Douglas Uggah Embas.

    Siapa sebenarnya yang berkuasa mengeluarkan permit korek pasir di Selangor? pertanyaan Lo'Lo. Ia lantas dijawab oleh Douglas: “Pihak yang berkuasa mengeluarkan permit pasir ialah kerajaan negeri manakala pengawal dan pemantaunya juga adalah kerajaan negeri, jadi dalam kes Selangor kerajaan negerilah yang bertanggungjawab.” Jadi faham-fahamlah mengenai perkara ini kerajaan pusat tidak ada ikut campur tahu.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lo’ Lo’ yang tidak berpuas hati dengan jawapan itu sebaliknya bertanya lagi: “Penguatkuasaannya pula siapa yang berkuasa, Pasukan Gerakan Am dan polis, apa yang mereka buat?,”. Jawab Douglas: “Penguatkuasaan juga kuasa kerajaan negeri.” Lantas terus mendiamkan Lo’ Lo’. Douglas ketika itu sedang menggulung perbahasan Rang Undang-Undang Pemuliharaan Hidupan Liar 2010 pada sidang Dewan Rakyat hari ini.

      Inilah dia bila sudah salah cuba pula menuduh orang lain melakukan kesalahan. Kita lihat sendiri inikah yang kununnya dulu kerajaan yang ingin membenteras rasuah?

      Delete
  55. Mengenai isu BERSIH lagi..Anwar Perlu di Salahkan dalam isu BERSIH 3.0?

    Apa pandangan kamu sekalian pembaca. Adakah perlu disalahkan Anwar atas sebab memberikan isyarat kepada Azmin untuk merempuh pagar sempadan semasa perhimpunan BERSIH baru-baru ini. PKR Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, Timbalan Presiden PKR Mohamed Azmin Ali dan Ketua PKR Chabang Rembau Badrul Hisham Shaharin didakwa di mahkamah atas tuduhan melanggar undang-undang ketika demonstrasi jalanan BERSIH 3.0 di Kuala Lumpur 28 April lepas. Jadi Kerana kesalahan ini sudah semestinya Anwar bersalah bukan. Kalau bukan Anwar yang mengarahkan maka pasti tidak berlaku rempuhan yang tidak sepatutnya berlaku.

    ReplyDelete
  56. zmin Menjadi orang Kaya dibawah ANWAR? Betulkah itu berlaku dahulu...Kita baca sedikit info ini..

    Ini harta Azmin ketika itu. Yang hairan gaji RM2,400 pada masa itu Azmin mampu memiliki harta yang banyak daripada gajinya sendiri. Azmin Ali didakwa memilki harta sejak 1991 – 1995, antara harta kekayaan Azmin adalah sebuah BMW 325i, Proton Wira 1.6 Xli, Proton Satria 1.6 Xli. Proton Perdana 2.0 SE, 1000 saha, m Hicom, sebuah rumah No. 23, Jalan 1/4D Bukit Mas, Taman Melawati seluas 8500 sqft. Bayangkan harta Azmin kekayaan azmin? Siapa ketuanya sudah pastilah Anwar. Tidakkan orang lain pula bukan.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. SEBAB ITULAH JUGA KENAPA AZMIN TERUS SETIA DENGAH ANWAR. KERANA INGIN MEMBALAS BUDI ANWAR DULU TERHADAP DIRINYA. BOLEH FAHAM SEKARANG APA YANG BERLAKU DENGAH KES RASUAH PEMBANGKANG. YANG SELAMA INI ASYIK MENUDUH KERAJAAN MAIN RASUAH. TAPI ANWAR TIDAK SEDAR YANG MANA DIA PUN TIDAK LARI DARI RASUAH. KITA MAHU KES INI AKAN TERUS DISIASAT. ANWAR MENYALAHGUNA KUASA SEMASA MENJADI TPM DAHULU.

      Delete
    2. Kes salahguna kuasa dan rasuah Anwar akan terus disiasat dan diteliti hingga ke Singapura dan United Kingdom. siasatan jangan alang-alang.

      Delete
    3. Azmin jadi kaya raya jika terus bersama Anwar, itu sebab beliau tidak mau lari dari parti pembangkang.

      Delete
  57. Yang terbaru pula mengenai laporan yang dibuat oleh Anuar Shaari, individu yang pertama membuat laporan polis dan Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM) tentang kes saham-saham Azmin Ali membuka semula siasatan kes rasuah melibatkan Timbalan Presiden Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) dan isterinya itu. Ini nampak bahawa PKR tidak sedar yang hanya tahu menyalahkan BN namun parti PKR sendiri pun apa kurangnya.

    Sebelum ini, Azmin Ali telah dikaitkan dengan dakwaan skandal seks berdasarkan beberapa keping gambar yang tersebar di Internet dan tidak terlepas juga, laporan berita pendedahan mengenai dakwaan penyelewengan oleh Azmin Ali sekitar 16/17 tahun lalu dibongkar semula oleh blogger Malaysia Today, Raja Petra Kamaruddin. Dengan itu beberapa individu pilihan untuk memberikan respon balas selepas sahaja pendedahan yang dibongkarkan oleh blogger Malaysia Today mengenai dakwaan skandal rasuah Azmin Ali ini termausklah individu seperti Umi Hafilda (adik kepada Azmin Ali), Zahid Mat Arip (Mursyidul Am TIBAI – Tolak Individu Bernama Anwar Ibrahim), Ezam Mat Noor (Senator Dewan Negara), Datuk Zahrain (Ahli Parlimen Bebas – Bayan Baru). Pendirian cukup jelas yang salah tetap salah. Itu sebablah ada kalangan penyokong, yang sukar menerima dengan hati yang terbuka realiti yang berlaku pada pemimpin mereka.

    Ini menampaknya yang mana Anwar yang berkuasa ketika itu menyebabkan BPR terpaksa mengikut arahan beliau. Namun bukannya sekarang Anwar tidak ada kuasa lagi. Sekarang SPRM tahu apa yang patut mereka lakukan. apakah selama ini kertas siasatan yang tersimpan rapi oleh Badan Pencegah Rasuah (BPR) dan kemudiannya di bawah Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM) “tidak sedar” kertas siasatan mengenai Azmin Ali selama bertahun-tahun lamanya, seolah-oleh kertas siasatan itu tidak pernah ada dengan mereka? Sehingga menyebabkan seorang blogger “terpaksa” memberikan tekanan dan peringatan dengan mengeluarkan semula bukti di mana , Timbalan Presiden Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) yang juga merangkap Ahli Parlimen Gobak, Azmin Ali didakwa melakukan penyelewengan dengan mengumpul kekayaan semasa beliau berkhidmat dengan kerajaan.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kes Azmin Ali tidak pernah diberikan perhatian oleh orang ramai walaupun ia juga satu kesalahan rasuah. Sepatutnya ia disiasat oleh SPRM.

      Delete
    2. Untuk memanteras rasuah, penyiasatan yang adil perlulah diadakan tidak kira siapa yang dituduh.

      Delete
    3. Kes Azmin Ali juga perlu di siasat, baru lah adil.

      Delete
  58. Bagaimana pula dengan kes Tian Chua sendiri yang melibatkan USD 10 juta, Mohamed Azmin dan isteri, Shamsidar Taharin memiliki saham, rumah dan kereta mewah bernilai kira-kira RM1.5 juta dan hampir RM10 juta dalam bentuk wang tunai dan cek dan Anwar Ibrahim yang terlibat dengan salah guna kuasa dan memiliki aset bernilai sehingga RM3 bilion ketika menjadi Timbalan Perdana Menteri??

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dalam mata penyokong pembangkang, mereka tidak akan percaya bahawa pemimpin pembangkang akan terlibat dalam rasuah, tapi pembangkang juga manusia, mereka juga akan melakukan kesalahan, percaya atau tidak, baik siasat terlebih dahulu.

      Delete
    2. Bagi penyokong pembangkang, pemimpin mereka yang terbaik dan jujur, sedangkan sudah terbukti dengan kes Tian Chua, Mohamed Azmin dan Anwar, itu siapa mau cakap.

      Delete
  59. Pihak berkuasa harus membuktikan sama ada Musa terlibat atau tidak. Semakin banyak andaian telah dibuat.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jangan sampai rakyat terpengaruh dan hilang kepecayaan terhadap beliau.

      Delete
  60. Kes rasuah harus dikurangkan khas buaya besar yang masih belum dikenakan tindakan undang-undang.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Sering Musa dikaitkan kes rasuah. Masing-masing pandai menilaikannya sejauh mana berita ini boleh dipercayai.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Buat masa ini, Musa adalh pemimpin Sabah yang terbaik.

    ReplyDelete
  63. Tidak perlu kita berdebat tentang perkara ini, jika CM sudah keluarkan statement yang menyatakan beliau tidak ada kaitan dengan kes ini, maka sudah jelas lah. Jika betul beliau bersalah pun biarlah pihak yang bertanggungjawab menjalankan siasatan dan menjatuhkan hukuman setimpalnya. Walaup apapun Musa Aman tetap banyak berjasa kepada Sabah walaupun ramai yang tidak buta untuk melihat perubahan yang telah beliau usahakan.

    ReplyDelete
  64. simpanan rm3 bilion Anwar di luar negara macam mana?? kenapa tidak bongkar?? kalau begini la situasi politik Malaysia, baik ramai2 la join pembangkang.. sebab kalau pemimpin2 pembangkang buat rasuah, semuanya halal dan dibenarkan..

    ReplyDelete
  65. Datuk Musa already made a statement that the money is not belong to him... Statement from CM:

    “To me there is no such thing. You think if I am wrong I would be standing here.

    “I am open anytime to be investigated. I am ready to face it anytime.

    “What we are going to do now is to tell the truth. I am innocent until proven guilty.”

    If he really did wrong, i bet he must be not a CM anymore. But he standing still as Sabah CM. We the people have to and need to support him until there's proof for the charge.

    ReplyDelete

Search This Blog